Comparative Negligence Legal guidelines on Motor Insurance Claims – Forbes

Editor's Note: We earn a commission through affiliate links on Forbes Advisor. Commissions do not affect the opinions or ratings of our editors.

The first thing you likely think about right after a car accident is whether someone has been injured. If you're lucky and no one has been seriously injured, you are probably wondering how much damage the cars took – and who is to blame. The saying "There is enough guilt to go around" sums up the concept of comparative negligence laws for auto insurance claims.

In 2020, property damage, injuries, and deaths from automobile accidents cost around $ 474 billion, according to estimates by the National Safety Council. With claims costing billions of dollars in claims, determining who is at fault after a car accident is critical for insurance companies. As a driver, understanding how to detect a bug is also important as it affects both the amount of money you may have to pay and the amount you will receive after an accident.

Determining who is at fault in an accident is based in part on the negligence laws of the state. These laws dictate how the fault can be shared after a car accident and the extent to which you can be compensated for damage by the other driver, if necessary.

What are comparative negligence laws for car accidents?

Comparative negligence laws determine how responsibility for an accident should be shared when two or more drivers are involved. The extent of your negligence determines whether and to what extent you will receive compensation.

Damage payments can be divided proportionally according to the negligent behavior of the driver. This means that each driver involved could potentially seek compensation from the other driver's insurance company.

Why should you care about negligence laws? They affect your ability to make a claim and the amount of cash that you can receive from the other party and their insurance company.

If you share responsibility, this can be taken into account when making a claim with the other driver's insurance. This is called vehicle liability insurance.

If you are making a claim with your own insurance coverage, e.g.

Types of Comparative Negligence

There are two main types of comparative negligence: pure comparative negligence and modified comparative negligence. Slight gross negligence is a rare third type that is only used in one state, South Dakota.

Your state's negligence law determines whether and how much you can collect if you bring an accident claim against the other party.

Pure comparative law of negligence

A pure negligence law allows both drivers to claim damages in the event of an accident. It makes this possible regardless of your share of the guilt. This means that you can make a claim even if you are 99% responsible for the accident. Pure, comparatively gross negligence, however, reduces your billing by your degree of fault.

For example, if you are 99% responsible, your billing amount will be reduced by 99%.

In short, everyone is responsible for their part of the fault and can sue the part not at fault with the insurance of the other.

Here are 12 states that have pure comparative negligence laws:

  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Florida
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Mississippi
  • Missouri
  • New Mexico
  • new York
  • Rhode Island
  • Washington

Modified Comparative Negligence

A modified law on relative negligence allows you to cash in on the other driver, but only if your fault is below a certain threshold. While you can assert a claim in the case of pure comparative negligence if you are 99% at fault, this is not the case with modified comparatives.

Two threshold rules are used: a 50% rule and a 51% rule.

With a 50% threshold rule, you can't move in if you are responsible for 50% or more. If your fault is equal to or greater than that of the other driver, then you are out of luck if you want to bring a claim against the other driver's insurance. There are 10 states with modified comparative negligence 50% rule.

The 50% rule of modified comparative negligence states:

  • Arkansas
  • Colorado
  • Georgia
  • Idaho
  • Kansas
  • Maine
  • Nebraska
  • North Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Utah

A 51% threshold rule is similar, but you can still collect from the other party if you are at fault up to 50%. Once you have reached the 51 percent mark, you will no longer be able to claim any compensation this way. There are 23 states with modified comparative negligence laws that follow the 51% rule.

51% rule modified comparative negligence states:

  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Montana
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • Ohio
  • Oklahoma
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • South carolina
  • Texas
  • Vermont
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin
  • Wyoming

Slight gross comparative negligence

South Dakota is the only state that has slight gross negligence law. It is not as final as the pure or modified laws on comparative negligence as there are no precise definitions of "minor" or "gross" in the law.

Under South Dakota law, you can only claim compensation by filing a claim with the other driver's insurance company if your negligence is "minor" compared to the other driver whose negligence is "gross" ( severe) is. If there is no significant difference in fault, you cannot claim the damage from the other motorist.

For example, let's say you are reversing and hit a car that is double-parked on the street. The other party could easily be to blame for parking there temporarily. Nevertheless, as the driver of the moving vehicle who has not fully perceived your surroundings, you are grossly negligent.

In this scenario, you cannot make any claims against the other driver. However, your insurance company could compensate the other driver for the damage minus the percentage of fault.

How does comparative negligence affect claims from motor insurance?

To the pure comparative negligence, You can make a claim and collect it from the other driver's insurance company as long as you are not 100% responsible for the accident.

For example, let's say you're a New York driver and you're driving a stop sign. The other driver saw you coming but continued anyway. You are primarily to blame, so insurance companies see you as 80% guilty. The other driver did not avoid the accident so he bears 20% responsibility.

In this hypothetical scenario:

  • You can claim 20% of your damage with the other driver insurance (100% less 80% of your fault is 20%).
  • If the cost of repairing your car is $ 3,000, it will give you $ 600.
  • The other driver could claim 80% of his damage with your insurance. (100% less your 20% error rate is 80%).
  • If the cost of repairing the other driver's car is $ 3,000, the other driver will get $ 2,400.

In the event of an injury, regardless of fault, any driver would first file a claim under their Personal Injury Coverage (PIP), which New York Auto Insurance requires.

Here is another example. For example, suppose you're driving on the California freeway, looking at your phone, not realizing that traffic is stalling and the car is pulling away in front of you. As a distracted driver, you are fully to blame for the accident.

In this case, you are responsible for 100% of the damage to the other driver and the other driver for 0% of your damage. If you have collision insurance that pays for damage to your car regardless of fault, you can file a collision claim with your own insurer. It would pay your damage up to your limit minus your deductible.

Under the modified relative negligence 50% rule, You can collect as long as you are not the same or more responsible than the other driver. That is, if it is found 50% or more at fault, you will not be able to pick up from the other driver's insurance.

For example, you live in Colorado and you have been driving another car on the same lane on the freeway at the same time. They are both found 50% guilty so neither would get a refund from the other's insurance company. Instead, everyone would have to file a claim for damages with their own insurance company.

But let's say you turned on your signal and the other driver didn't, so the insurance companies decided that you were 45% responsible and the other driver was 55% at fault. In this case, you can file a claim with the other driver's insurance. Your fault percentage reduces your compensation so that you only get 55% of your damage. If your loss is $ 5,000, you will receive $ 2,750.

For the modified comparative negligence 51% rule, You cannot claim compensation from the other party if you are more at fault than the other driver's. It differs from the 50% rule because under this rule, if both drivers are 50% to blame, they can make claims against the other party.

For example, you are a driver in Texas who is driving down a street when a car suddenly pulls up in front of you. It suddenly slows down but has no working brake lights. Because of your high speed, you cannot stop in time and hit the rear of the vehicle.

The other driver is 51% guilty of the sudden maneuver on the lane and defective brake lights. The other driver cannot assert any claims against your insurance because he owed more than half with 51%. You are found 49% guilty of speeding, so you can file a lawsuit against the other party. Your damage will be reduced by 49% so if the damage is $ 3,000 you will get $ 1,530.

How do you diagnose a failure after a car accident?

Insurance companies usually have the final say on fault as they pay off the claims. But many other variables are involved in their determination of negligence and fault.

First, the police can help. As a rule, if violations are found, the police will create a ticket – such as a driver who has run over a red light – and write down explanations and notes about the incident.

In some cities, the police only react to serious accidents with injuries or hit-and-run. If so, your insurance company will not blame you for the lack of a police report. (But make sure that if the state requires you to file a driver accident report, you do so in the time required.) At the scene of the accident, you and the other driver will need to exchange information, including insurance information.

While a police report is nice to have, insurance companies conduct an investigation once claims are made and do not always align with the police officer's findings.

Insurance companies speak to drivers and witnesses, look at damaged vehicles, and review motor vehicle law. You can also do an accident site survey to examine the roadway where the accident occurred.

To support the course of the damage, you can share photos, videos or recordings with a dash camera showing the course of the accident or the consequences.

After examining the evidence, the insurance companies will decide the percentage of fault of each driver and pay the claims under negligence laws. Ultimately, unless it goes to court, the insurance companies make the final determination of fault. In this case a judge or a jury would decide.

Compare prices

Compare prices from participating partners through EverQuote's secure website.

Car insurance rates


Compare prices

Compare prices from participating partners through EverQuote's secure website.

Car insurance rates

very good

Compare prices

Compare prices from participating partners through EverQuote's secure website.

Explanation of terms related to troubleshooting car accidents

Here are some terms to know in case the insurance company uses them in determining fault:

  • Sensible and prudent: Addresses what the average attentive driver would do in a situation. Did you act rationally and carefully before or during the accident? Maybe not if you tried to knock someone into a lane or risked the yellow light turning red as you drive through them.
  • Duty and breach of duty: A driver's duty is how to act or not. For example, you need to pay attention to the road. Distracting your attention from driving by texting is a breach of duty.
  • Increased duty of care: In some situations, you have more obligations. For example, as a motorist, you have a greater duty of care around cyclists and pedestrians as you can cause more damage.
  • Obvious cause: The act – or omission – of a driver that was the primary cause of the accident, such as B. not stopping at a red light.
  • Last clear chance: If there is anything you can do to prevent the accident, this is what you should do. For example, to avoid an accident, wait longer at a four-way stop sign even after it's your turn if someone else doesn't stop. You may be partially responsible if you had the time and opportunity but did not take workaround measures to avoid an accident.

Actions that can get you into trouble in some of these conditions can include:

  • Honk
  • Apply your brakes
  • Avoid another vehicle

If you could have swerved or tried to evade an accident but didn't, you could be held partially responsible for an accident. Insurance companies may view this as your carelessness and carelessness or irresponsibility in driving.

If you have acted as an attentive, sensible driver and the insurance company does not agree, you can contest their acceptance. Having evidence like footage from dash cameras can help steer it into your path.

Frequently asked questions about comparative negligence laws

Will my car insurance rates go up after a car accident?

Yes, your rates could go up after a culpable accident.

State laws and insurance company policies vary, but in general, if an accident affects your rates, you must be primarily to blame. For example, California auto insurance rates can go up if you owe at least 51% despite the fact that it is a purely comparatively negligent condition.

In New York, a culpable driver receives a surcharge (increased tariffs) if the incident resulted in injury, death, or property damage over $ 2,000.

Forbes Advisor's analysis found that post-accident car insurance rates for culpable drivers increased by an average of 41%.

How does contribution negligence compare to comparative negligence?

Comparable negligence enables drivers who are partially at fault to still claim damages from the other party. Negligence is more restrictive and does not allow one driver to be compensated by the other driver's insurance company if even 1% of the fault is found.

The District of Columbia and four states adhere to negligence laws:

  • Alabama
  • Maryland
  • North Carolina
  • Virginia

In these states, if a driver contributed in any way to the accident, no claims can be made against the other party.
For example, if two cars backed up into each other in a parking lot, each contributed to the incident. This means that each of the other party in a state of contributory negligence would not be able to recover.

Let us instead assume that the accident occurred in a state of comparative negligence. In this case, one or both drivers may be able to file a claim with the other driver's insurance company.

For example, if a driver was much further out of the parking lot and found only 30% of the blame, that driver could claim the 70% that he was not to blame. The other driver can assert in a pure, comparatively negligent state for the 30% that he was not responsible for, but could not in states with a 50% or 51% rule.

What if I do not agree to troubleshooting after an accident?

You can first discuss your problems with the insurance claims adjuster. This is usually your contact person at the insurance company. Next, there may be an appeal process with the insurance company to try to resolve the issue if you are otherwise unable to resolve your issues.

If you are still at a dead end after the appeal, contact your state's Department of Insurance (DOI) to see if the disputed claim is under review. In some states, DOIs will review such issues to ensure the insurance company is conducting a proper investigation and resolution.

If an agreement still cannot be reached, the next step could be a lawsuit against the other party. In this way, a judge or jury would make the final decision on the error and the possible settlement.

An alternative option is to see if you can drop the claim with the other driver's insurance and make a claim about your coverage. You would be paid for damages up to your limit but owe any associated deductibles.

Your insurance company could then coordinate with the other insurance company on compensation if it determines that the other driver is at fault (or partially at fault and can be compensated based on negligence laws). If they find that the other driver is completely at fault, your insurance provider may be able to request reimbursement of your deductible from the other party.

Comments are closed.